MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Qualcomm QCS6490

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Qualcomm QCS6490, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or QCS6490.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

34%

QCS6490

42%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

89%

QCS6490

81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

33%

QCS6490

40%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	QCS6490
Total score	755955	592145
CPU	211667	165802
GPU	287263	225011
MEM	120958	94749
UX	136072	106579

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	QCS6490
Single-Core	1112	920
Multi-Core	3904	3344

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	QCS6490
Frequency	2500 MHz	2700 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	5200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	3200
Memory bandwidth	48	16
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS6490 is 7% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 643L
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	812 MHz
GFloPS	1856	1573
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		576
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.1	26.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	89.7	67.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.8	92.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.1	51.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	77.7	57.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	111.6	84.9
Real Racing 3	108.1	115.8
Sniper 3D	118.2	148.5
Need for Speed No Limits	75.1	129.7
Mortal Kombat X	79.3	120.8
CSR Racing 2	65.9	120.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Modem QCM6490 5G
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF	NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 15
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra specs and review.

QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS6490 specs and review.