Comparisons 23-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 2000, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 778G or Exynos 2000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 778G | 98% |
Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 778G | 98% |
Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 778G | 91% |
Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 778G |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 508178 | 645405 | | CPU | 91177 | 194979 | | GPU | 113501 | 273165 | | MEM | 52158 | 106071 | | UX | 47521 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 778G |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 789 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 2870 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 778G |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Prime
3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 17% better than Snapdragon 778G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 906.58 | 854 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2900 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GBeidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, GPS, QZSS | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
