 |
Mali-T860 MP3 at 700 MHz vs PowerVR GX6250 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz vs PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP3 or PowerVR GX6250.
Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz vs PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz |
PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 62586 | 79647 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 4409 | | | | | GFloPS | 71.4 GFloPS | 83.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 306 MT/s | 266 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.9 GP/s | 2.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 10 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
