 |
Mali-T720 MP4 at 600 MHz vs PowerVR G6200 at 450 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz vs PowerVR G6200 @ 450MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T720 MP4 or PowerVR G6200.
Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz vs PowerVR G6200 @ 450MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz |
PowerVR G6200 @ 450MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 450 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 39468 | 50430 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 48 GFloPS | 57.6 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 386 MT/s | 184 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.2 GP/s | 1.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 10 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which PowerVR G6200 @ 450MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
