 |
Mali-T860 MP4 at 600 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Full compare data of Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP4 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 72864 | 67033 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 3055 | | | | | GFloPS | 81.6 GFloPS | 179 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 262 MT/s | 492 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.2 GP/s | 6.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
