Comparisons 28-07-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs Google Tensor, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 97% |
Tensor | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 89% |
Tensor | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 92% |
Tensor | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Tensor | | Total score | 801076 | 798643 | | CPU | 163368 | 242744 | | GPU | 139627 | 264574 | | MEM | 106600 | 147863 | | UX | 93142 | 128575 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Tensor | | Single-Core | 1180 | 1045 | | Multi-Core | 4137 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Tensor | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 640 KB | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 3% better than Tensor in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 986 | | # of Cores | 6 | 22 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor
|
