Comparisons 28-07-2022
Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, and how good the chipsets are in games Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Dimensity 1050.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 97% |
Dimensity 1050 | 87% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 89% |
Dimensity 1050 | 83% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 92% |
Dimensity 1050 | 96% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Dimensity 1050 | | Total score | 801076 | 574847 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Dimensity 1050 | | Single-Core | 1180 | 1223 | | Multi-Core | 4137 | 3794 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Dimensity 1050 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 5600 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 640 KB | 320 KB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 13% better than Dimensity 1050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G610 MC3 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 1008 | | # of Cores | 6 | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 20 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1050 is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
|
