Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

Comparisons 16-07-2023

Detailed compare data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T760 or MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T760

32%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T760

83%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T760

31%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

55%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T760	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
Total score	446896	801076
CPU	125130	224307
GPU	169811	304401
MEM	71503	128182
UX	80437	144193

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T760	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
Single-Core	653	1180
Multi-Core	2693	4137

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T760	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
Frequency	2500 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		6200 millions
Core configuration	1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4/4x/4y	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	6400
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	256 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	640 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 13% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	912
# of Cores	5	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.9	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.3	94.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.8	56.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.8	52.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	49.8	81.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	75.6	117.8
Real Racing 3	72.3	113.7
Sniper 3D	128.4	125.1
Need for Speed No Limits	81.2	79.5
Mortal Kombat X	84.1	82.4
CSR Racing 2	64.7	68.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	20 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Ivy V510 5G	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3500 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T760 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max specs and review.