Comparisons 28-07-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 97% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 89% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 92% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 801076 | 698731 | | CPU | 163368 | 222644 | | GPU | 139627 | 234492 | | MEM | 106600 | 130499 | | UX | 93142 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 1180 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 4137 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3130 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | | | L2 cache | 640 KB | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 7% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 6 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 13
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
