Comparisons 28-07-2022
Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Exynos 2200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 97% |
Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 89% |
Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 92% |
Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2200 | | Total score | 801076 | 941706 | | CPU | 163368 | 194890 | | GPU | 139627 | 273522 | | MEM | 106600 | 105982 | | UX | 93142 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2200 | | Single-Core | 1180 | 1389 | | Multi-Core | 4137 | 3976 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2200 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | | | L2 cache | 640 KB | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 3% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 500 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 2124 | | # of Cores | 6 | | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
|
