MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons 28-07-2022

Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

57%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

83%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max

55%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max	Exynos 2200
Total score	801076	941706
CPU	224307	263671
GPU	304401	357838
MEM	128182	150662
UX	144193	169511

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	1180	1389
Multi-Core	4137	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2900 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	64 KB
L2 cache	640 KB
L3 cache	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 3% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	912	2124
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	31.5	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	94.1	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.2	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	52.5	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	81.1	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	117.8	137.1
Real Racing 3	113.7	133.8
Sniper 3D	125.1	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	79.5	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	82.4	95.1
CSR Racing 2	68.4	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.