 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
|
Comparisons 18-03-2023 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 7200 or MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 7200 | 48% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 57% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 7200 | 86% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 7200 | 47% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 55% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 7200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Total score | 672473 | 801076 | CPU | 188302 | 224307 | GPU | 255546 | 304401 | MEM | 107598 | 128182 | UX | 121048 | 144193 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 7200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Single-Core | 990 | 1180 | Multi-Core | 3473 | 4137 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 7200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 6200 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 640 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is 24% better than Dimensity 7200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G610 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 1176 | 912 | # of Cores | 4 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 31.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 94.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 52.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 81.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 117.8 | Real Racing 3 | | 113.7 | Sniper 3D | | 125.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 79.5 | Mortal Kombat X | | 82.4 | CSR Racing 2 | | 68.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 23 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Dimensity 7200 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
| |
|