Comparisons 03-12-2021
Detailed compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Snapdragon 895.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 81% |
Snapdragon 895 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 73% |
Snapdragon 895 | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 74% |
Snapdragon 895 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Snapdragon 895 | | Total score | 494245 | 913355 | | CPU | 135989 | 268491 | | GPU | 116434 | 334895 | | MEM | 88895 | 153388 | | UX | 77760 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Snapdragon 895 | | Single-Core | 1058 | 1274 | | Multi-Core | 3495 | 4016 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Snapdragon 895 | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 88 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 1 MB | | L2 cache | | 2 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 895 is 10% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 686 | 1800 | | # of Cores | 4 | | | # of Shader Units | 128 | 1024 | | Display | 2000 x 1000 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 10000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• PUBG mobile
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
