Comparisons 20-05-2022 Detailed compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, and how good the processors are in games GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1300T or Snapdragon 895.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 95% |
Snapdragon 895 | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 87% |
Snapdragon 895 | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 89% |
Snapdragon 895 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Snapdragon 895 | Total score | 694535 | 913355 | CPU | 163368 | 268491 | GPU | 139627 | 334895 | MEM | 106600 | 153388 | UX | 93142 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Snapdragon 895 | Single-Core | 1477 | 1274 | Multi-Core | 4585 | 4016 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Snapdragon 895 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 88 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 32 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 320 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 895 is 10% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 504 | 1800 | # of Cores | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 10000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 21 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• PUBG mobile • Devices lists • Benchmarks • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
|