|
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 |
|
Comparisons 14-10-2023 Comprehensive compare data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or Snapdragon 895.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 53% |
Snapdragon 895 | 65% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 85% |
Snapdragon 895 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 52% |
Snapdragon 895 | 62% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Snapdragon 895 | Total score | 738244 | 913355 | CPU | 206711 | 255748 | GPU | 280524 | 347074 | MEM | 118115 | 146131 | UX | 132893 | 164393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Snapdragon 895 | Single-Core | 1058 | 1274 | Multi-Core | 4040 | 4016 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Snapdragon 895 | Frequency | 2620 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 88 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 895 is 9% better than HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 1800 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 34.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 87.4 | 108.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.4 | 63.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 49.9 | 59.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 75.8 | 92.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 107.5 | 133.9 | Real Racing 3 | 105.6 | 129.8 | Sniper 3D | 115.4 | 143.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 73.2 | 90.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 77.3 | 93.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.6 | 78.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 10000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 33 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 895 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|