Comparisons 03-12-2021
Full compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 vs Samsung Exynos 990, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 895 or Exynos 990.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 895 | 99% |
Exynos 990 | 93% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 895 | 84% |
Exynos 990 | 75% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 895 | 94% |
Exynos 990 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 990 | | Total score | 913355 | 520426 | | CPU | 268491 | 150964 | | GPU | 334895 | 211669 | | MEM | 153388 | 82183 | | UX | 139755 | 75906 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 990 | | Single-Core | 1274 | 1108 | | Multi-Core | 4016 | 3435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 990 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3300 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.93 GHz Exynos M5 Mongoose
2x2.56 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 990 is 12% better than Snapdragon 895 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MP11 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 786 | | # of Cores | | 11 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 61.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 55.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 61.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 61.7 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 49.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 75.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 123 | | Sniper 3D | | 116.9 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 86.1 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 80 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 80 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 25 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 3486 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 990 is better: 14
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• PUBG mobile
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 990
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
|
