Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons 14-09-2022

Detailed comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy A15 Bionic or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A15 Bionic

60%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A15 Bionic

80%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A15 Bionic

58%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A15 Bionic	Exynos 2200
Total score	841983	941706
CPU	235753	263671
GPU	319963	357838
MEM	134709	150662
UX	151566	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A15 Bionic	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	1716	1389
Multi-Core	4732	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A15 Bionic	Exynos 2200
Frequency	3232 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	15800 millions
Core configuration	2x3.23 GHz Avalanche 4x1.86 GHz Blizzard	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2800	2133
Memory bandwidth	92	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	2 MB
L2 cache	4 MB
L3 cache	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.5	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A15 Bionic is 13% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A15 Bionic has 2 more core than Exynos 2200. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Apple A15 Bionic GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	3232 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	2989.13	2124
# of Cores	5
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2796 x 1290 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	32.2	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	99.5	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	59.5	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	55.6	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	85.2	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	123.9	137.1
Real Racing 3	119.6	133.8
Sniper 3D	131.4	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	83.1	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	86.9	95.1
CSR Racing 2	71.3	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	12 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	12 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS	120	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Modem	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	7000 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	5000 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GNSS	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

A15 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• A15 Bionic specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.