Samsung Exynos 2200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Comprehensive testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Kirin 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

Kirin 9000

50%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

Kirin 9000

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

Kirin 9000

48%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	Kirin 9000
Total score	941706	698731
CPU	263671	195645
GPU	357838	265527
MEM	150662	111800
UX	169511	125774

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	Kirin 9000
Single-Core	1389	1023
Multi-Core	3976	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	Kirin 9000
Frequency	2800 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1600
Memory bandwidth	51.2	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 10% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Mali-G78 MP24
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	2124	1076
# of Cores		24
# of Shader Units	192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	27.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	83.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	50.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	46.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	71.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	103.1
Real Racing 3	133.8	88.6
Sniper 3D	147.7	65.8
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	60.7
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	65.8
CSR Racing 2	81.1	60.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Balong 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

Kirin 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000 specs and review.