Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 898.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

Snapdragon 898

72%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

Snapdragon 898

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

Snapdragon 898

69%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 898
Total score	941706	1004791
CPU	263671	281332
GPU	357838	381820
MEM	150662	160773
UX	169511	180867

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 898
Single-Core	1389	1401
Multi-Core	3976	4418

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 898
Frequency	2800 MHz	3090 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	3200
Memory bandwidth	51.2	88
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		1 MB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 9% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Adreno 730
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	970 MHz
GFloPS	2124	1800
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	192	1024
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	7680 x 4320 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	37.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	119.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	70.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	65.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	101.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	147.2
Real Racing 3	133.8	142.7
Sniper 3D	147.7	157.3
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	99.7
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	102.3
CSR Racing 2	81.1	86.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	128 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 680
Video Encoding FPS	120	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	6000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 35
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

Snapdragon 898 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 898 specs and review.