Comparisons 05-06-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 898.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Total score | 941706 | 1004791 | | CPU | 194890 | 268491 | | GPU | 273522 | 334895 | | MEM | 105982 | 153388 | | UX | 98170 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1401 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 4418 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3090 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 88 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 1 MB | | L2 cache | | 2 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 9% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 730 | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 1800 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 192 | 1024 | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 320 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 128 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
|
