Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Full compare data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 778G+.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

Snapdragon 778G+

40%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

Snapdragon 778G+

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

Snapdragon 778G+

38%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 778G+
Total score	941706	558996
CPU	263671	156527
GPU	357838	212417
MEM	150662	89441
UX	169511	100618

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 778G+
Single-Core	1389	868
Multi-Core	3976	3157

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 778G+
Frequency	2800 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count		4680 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x2.5 GHz Kryo 670 Prime 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	4666
Memory bandwidth	51.2	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		512 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 10% better than Snapdragon 778G+ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Adreno 642L
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	550 MHz
GFloPS	2124	906.58
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	192	512
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	28.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	59.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	55.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	56.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	46.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	73.5
Real Racing 3	133.8	96.3
Sniper 3D	147.7	71.6
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	66.1
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	71.8
CSR Racing 2	81.1	66.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	GLONASS, GBeidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

Snapdragon 778G+ SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 778G+ specs and review.