Comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 778G+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Snapdragon 778G+ | 92% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 778G+ | | Total score | 941706 | 558996 | | CPU | 194890 | 91177 | | GPU | 273522 | 113501 | | MEM | 105982 | 52158 | | UX | 98170 | 47521 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 778G+ | | Single-Core | 1389 | 868 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 3157 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 778G+ | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | | 4680 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x2.5 GHz Kryo 670 Prime
3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4666 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 17 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 512 KB | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | | L3 cache | | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 10% better than Snapdragon 778G+ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 642L | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 550 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 906.58 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 192 | 512 | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 192 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 36 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 1600 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | GLONASS, GBeidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
|
