Comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 780G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Total score | 941706 | 718020 | | CPU | 194890 | 91177 | | GPU | 273522 | 113501 | | MEM | 105982 | 52158 | | UX | 98170 | 47521 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1608 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 5467 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
Snapdragon 780G | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4666 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 17 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 512 KB | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | | L3 cache | | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 14% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 640 | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 750 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 986 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 192 | 384 | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 3360 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 192 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 9
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
|
