|
Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G |
|
Comparisons 08-10-2022 Comprehensive testing data of Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy A15 Bionic or Snapdragon 778G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA15 Bionic | 60% |
Snapdragon 778G | 36% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A15 Bionic | 80% |
Snapdragon 778G | 80% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA15 Bionic | 58% |
Snapdragon 778G | 33% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 778G | Total score | 841983 | 508178 | CPU | 235753 | 142283 | GPU | 319963 | 193112 | MEM | 134709 | 81312 | UX | 151566 | 91473 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 778G | Single-Core | 1716 | 789 | Multi-Core | 4732 | 2870 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 778G | Frequency | 3232 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 15800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche 4x1.86 GHz Blizzard | 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Prime 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2800 | 4666 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.5 | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A15 Bionic is 25% better than Snapdragon 778G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A15 Bionic has 2 more core than Snapdragon 778G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | Adreno 642L | GPU Frequency | 3232 MHz | 550 MHz | GFloPS | 2989.13 | 906.58 | # of Cores | 5 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 32.2 | 60.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 99.5 | 53.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 59.5 | 59.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 55.6 | 60.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 85.2 | 48.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 123.9 | 73.7 | Real Racing 3 | 119.6 | 119.3 | Sniper 3D | 131.4 | 113.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.1 | 83.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 86.9 | 77.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 71.3 | 77.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 5000 MBit/s. | 2900 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GNSS | GBeidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, GPS, QZSS | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G is better: 12 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A15 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 778G SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|