Comparisons 05-06-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 91% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Total score | 941706 | 1021474 | | CPU | 194890 | 163368 | | GPU | 273522 | 139627 | | MEM | 105982 | 106600 | | UX | 98170 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1168 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 4246 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3050 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | 8400 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 7500 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 52 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 128 KB | | L2 cache | | 1024 KB | | L3 cache | | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 8% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G710 MC10 | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 1648 | | # of Cores | | 10 | | # of Shader Units | 192 | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 320 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Google Tensor
|
