Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score	941706	1021474
CPU	263671	286017
GPU	357838	388151
MEM	150662	163439
UX	169511	183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core	1389	1168
Multi-Core	3976	4246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency	2800 MHz	3050 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		8400 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	7500
Memory bandwidth	51.2	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		128 KB
L2 cache		1024 KB
L3 cache		32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 8% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	2124	1648
# of Cores		10
# of Shader Units	192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	39.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	72.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	66.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	149.2
Real Racing 3	133.8	145.8
Sniper 3D	147.7	159.2
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	101.4
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	104.2
CSR Racing 2	81.1	87.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 31
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.