Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple M1

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Full testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple M1, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Vellamo, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2200 or M1.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

97%

100%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

92%

100%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

98%

100%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	M1
Total score	941706	1204017
CPU	263671	337129
GPU	357838	457523
MEM	150662	192638
UX	169511	216731

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	M1
Single-Core	1389	1807
Multi-Core	3976	7691

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	M1
Frequency	2800 MHz	3200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		16000 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	4x3.2 GHz Firestorm 4x2.0 GHz Icestorm
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2666
Memory bandwidth	51.2	64
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		48 KB
L2 cache		4 MB
L3 cache		12 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 12% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Apple M1
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	3200 MHz
GFloPS	2124	2600
# of Cores		8
# of Shader Units	192	128
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2732 x 2048 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	46.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	142.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	85.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	78.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	122.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	176.2
Real Racing 3	133.8	171.6
Sniper 3D	147.7	188.1
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	119.3
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	123.4
CSR Racing 2	81.1	102.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS	120	960
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Snapdragon X80 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	9500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	6000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 33
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

M1 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• M1 specs and review.