Comparisons 10-07-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chips in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 or Exynos 2200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 99% |
Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 89% |
Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 97% |
Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Exynos 2200 | | Total score | 1085878 | 941706 | | CPU | 268491 | 194890 | | GPU | 334895 | 273522 | | MEM | 153388 | 105982 | | UX | 139755 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Exynos 2200 | | Single-Core | 1514 | 1389 | | Multi-Core | 4774 | 3976 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Exynos 2200 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is 12% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 500 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 2124 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | 192 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 685 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GNSS, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou, GLONASS, NavIC | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
