Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Detailed comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

56%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

54%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Total score	941706	785369
CPU	263671	219905
GPU	357838	298431
MEM	150662	125656
UX	169511	141372

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Single-Core	1389	1157
Multi-Core	3976	4056

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Frequency	2800 MHz	2850 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		6200 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	6400
Memory bandwidth	51.2	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		64 KB
L2 cache		640 KB
L3 cache		16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is 1% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	2124	912
# of Cores		6
# of Shader Units	192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	30.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	93.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	55.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	51.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	79.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	114.9
Real Racing 3	133.8	112.8
Sniper 3D	147.7	122.7
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	77.4
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	81.3
CSR Racing 2	81.1	67.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 specs and review.