Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A12Z Bionic

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Detailed testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A12Z Bionic, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Exynos 2200 or A12Z Bionic.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

A12Z Bionic

52%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

A12Z Bionic

72%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

A12Z Bionic

49%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	A12Z Bionic
Total score	941706	729707
CPU	263671	204317
GPU	357838	277290
MEM	150662	116753
UX	169511	131357

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	A12Z Bionic
Single-Core	1389	1332
Multi-Core	3976	4661

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	A12Z Bionic
Frequency	2800 MHz	2490 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	7 nm
Transistors count		10000 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	4x2.49GHz Vortex 4x1.6 GHz Tempest
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	51.2	42
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		48 KB
L2 cache		4 MB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 11% better than A12Z Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Apple A12Z Bionic
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	2500 MHz
GFloPS	2124	1486
# of Cores		8
# of Shader Units	192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2732 x 2048 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	86.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	52.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	48.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	74.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	107.7
Real Racing 3	133.8	104.8
Sniper 3D	147.7	115.3
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	62.9
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	83.8
CSR Racing 2	81.1	68.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	12 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	12 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS	120	960
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Intel XMM 7560 LTE
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	1000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	350 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic is better: 9
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

A12Z Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• A12Z Bionic specs and review.