Comparisons 05-06-2022
Detailed testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A12Z Bionic, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Exynos 2200 or A12Z Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
A12Z Bionic | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
A12Z Bionic | | Total score | 941706 | 729707 | | CPU | 194890 | 179367 | | GPU | 273522 | 371998 | | MEM | 105982 | 95242 | | UX | 98170 | 75217 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
A12Z Bionic | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1332 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 4661 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
A12Z Bionic | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 48 KB | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 11% better than A12Z Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Apple A12Z Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 1486 | | # of Cores | | 8 | | # of Shader Units | 192 | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 86.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 52.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 48.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 74.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 107.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 104.8 | | Sniper 3D | | 115.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 62.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 83.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 68.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic is better: 21
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12Z Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
|
