Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons 07-10-2022

Comprehensive comparison data of Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Google Tensor G2 or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Google Tensor G2

64%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Google Tensor G2

85%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Google Tensor G2

62%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Google Tensor G2	Exynos 2200
Total score	888986	941706
CPU	248916	263671
GPU	337807	357838
MEM	142228	150662
UX	160015	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Google Tensor G2	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	1164	1389
Multi-Core	3194	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Google Tensor G2	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2850 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.34 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	2133
Memory bandwidth	51.2	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Google Tensor G2 is 1% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G710 MP07	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	1535.23	2124
# of Cores	16
# of Shader Units		192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.2	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	105.5	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.4	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.9	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	90.7	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	129.1	137.1
Real Racing 3	126.9	133.8
Sniper 3D	138.3	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	88.3	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	91.1	95.1
CSR Racing 2	75.6	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5123	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	9750 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	7500 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, GLONASS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, NavIC enabled, NavIC	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G2 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 24
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Google Tensor G2 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Google Tensor G2 specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.