Comparisons 05-06-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Google Tensor, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
Tensor | | Total score | 941706 | 798643 | | CPU | 194890 | 242744 | | GPU | 273522 | 264574 | | MEM | 105982 | 147863 | | UX | 98170 | 128575 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
Tensor | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1045 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
Tensor | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 1 MB | | L2 cache | | 2 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 986 | | # of Cores | | 22 | | # of Shader Units | 192 | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 11
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Google Tensor
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 1050 Vs Google Tensor
|
