Comparisons 13-07-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2200, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus or Exynos 2200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 98% |
Exynos 2200 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 93% |
Exynos 2200 | 92% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 95% |
Exynos 2200 | 98% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Exynos 2200 | | Total score | 1062639 | 941706 | | CPU | 163368 | 194890 | | GPU | 139627 | 273522 | | MEM | 106600 | 105982 | | UX | 93142 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Exynos 2200 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 1389 | | Multi-Core | 4417 | 3976 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Exynos 2200 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | 8400 millions | | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 32 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 12% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 500 MHz | | GFloPS | 1648 | 2124 | | # of Cores | 10 | | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
