MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

34%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

89%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

33%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Exynos 2200
Total score	755955	941706
CPU	211667	263671
GPU	287263	357838
MEM	120958	150662
UX	136072	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	1112	1389
Multi-Core	3904	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2500 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	1856	2124
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.1	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	89.7	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.8	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.1	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	77.7	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	111.6	137.1
Real Racing 3	108.1	133.8
Sniper 3D	118.2	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	75.1	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	79.3	95.1
CSR Racing 2	65.9	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 28
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.