Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875

Comparisons 05-06-2022

Detailed testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 875.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

Snapdragon 875

64%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

Snapdragon 875

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

Snapdragon 875

61%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 875
Total score	941706	892580
CPU	263671	249924
GPU	357838	339178
MEM	150662	142802
UX	169511	160655

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 875
Single-Core	1389	1404
Multi-Core	3976	4904

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	Snapdragon 875
Frequency	2800 MHz	2840 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2750
Memory bandwidth	51.2	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		512 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 875 is 1% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Adreno 660
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	2124	1486
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	192	512
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	34.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	105.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	63.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	58.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	90.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	130.5
Real Racing 3	133.8	126.8
Sniper 3D	147.7	139.5
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	88.8
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	91.9
CSR Racing 2	81.1	76.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	6000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

Snapdragon 875 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 875 specs and review.