MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Exynos 2200
Total score	530286	941706
CPU	148477	263671
GPU	201504	357838
MEM	84843	150662
UX	95447	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	850	1389
Multi-Core	2957	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2500 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	256	2124
# of Cores	8
# of Shader Units	256	192
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	137.1
Real Racing 3	103.8	133.8
Sniper 3D	114.5	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	95.1
CSR Racing 2	62.6	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 29
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.