Comparisons 05-06-2022
Full testing data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Dimensity 1300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2200 | 97% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2200 | 92% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2200 | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Total score | 941706 | 801200 | | CPU | 194890 | 163368 | | GPU | 273522 | 139627 | | MEM | 105982 | 106600 | | UX | 98170 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Single-Core | 1389 | 1455 | | Multi-Core | 3976 | 4766 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 32 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 32 KB | | L2 cache | | 320 KB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 6% better than Exynos 2200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 2124 | 504 | | # of Cores | | 9 | | # of Shader Units | 192 | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3670 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
|
