HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons   16-01-2024
   Detailed comparison data of HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2200, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Kirin 8000 or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 8000

30%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 8000

86%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 8000

27%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 8000	Exynos 2200
Total score	659883	941706
CPU	184769	263671
GPU	250747	357838
MEM	105574	150662
UX	118769	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 8000	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	945	1389
Multi-Core	3611	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 8000	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2200 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 21% better than Kirin 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Maleoon 910	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	2056	2124
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	30.6	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	74.9	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	103.6	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	57.7	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	64.6	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	94.6	137.1
Real Racing 3	128.5	133.8
Sniper 3D	165.8	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	144.2	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	118.7	95.1
CSR Racing 2	144.5	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	128 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Balong 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	14000 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 8000 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 8000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 8000 specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.