MediaTek MT8188J vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons   18-06-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek MT8188J vs Samsung Exynos 2200, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT8188J or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8188J

25%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8188J

72%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8188J

24%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8188J	Exynos 2200
Total score	360113	941706
CPU	100831	263671
GPU	136847	357838
MEM	57613	150662
UX	64810	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8188J	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	665	1389
Multi-Core	2195	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8188J	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2200 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	8 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	28	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 21% better than MT8188J in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	486	2124
# of Cores	2
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.5	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	55.6	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	45.1	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	37.7	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	46.4	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	71.9	137.1
Real Racing 3	67.6	133.8
Sniper 3D	72.1	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	81.1	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	72.2	95.1
CSR Racing 2	58.4	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	750 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	300 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8188J is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 36
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8188J SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8188J specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.