Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons   22-09-2023
   Full compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or Exynos 2200.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2200

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra51% Exynos 220067%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra86% Exynos 220085%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra49% Exynos 220064%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra Exynos 2200
Total score719546941706
CPU201463263671
GPU273436357838
MEM115118150662
UX129523169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra Exynos 2200
Single-Core10591389
Multi-Core37163976

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra Exynos 2200
Frequency2200 MHz2800 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm4 nm
Transistors count6200 millions
Core configuration2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)8 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4xLPDDR5
Max. Memory32 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency64002133
Memory bandwidth4851.2
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache128 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 21% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G610 MP6Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency600 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS9122124
# of Cores6
# of Shader Units192
Display2560 x 1440 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile28.135.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)85.5111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.166.9
Call of Duty: Mobile47.161.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)73.294.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition106.8137.1
Real Racing 3103.1133.8
Sniper 3D113.5147.7
Need for Speed No Limits62.693.9
Mortal Kombat X82.195.1
CSR Racing 267.481.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution200 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution32 MP64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240120
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeExynos Modem 5200
Download speed4700 MBit/s.7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.3670 MBit/s.
NavigationGlonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavICQZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 29
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Exynos 2200 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands