Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Comparisons   05-06-2022
   Detailed comparison data of Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2200 or MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2200

67%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

50%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2200

85%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2200

64%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

48%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Total score	941706	694535
CPU	263671	194474
GPU	357838	263927
MEM	150662	111132
UX	169511	125023

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Single-Core	1389	1477
Multi-Core	3976	4585

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2200	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Frequency	2800 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count		5800 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	51.2	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		320 KB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 7% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Samsung Xclipse 920	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	2124	504
# of Cores		9
# of Shader Units	192
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	35.3	27.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	111.1	83.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	66.9	50.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	61.1	46.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	94.6	70.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	137.1	102.5
Real Racing 3	133.8	88.9
Sniper 3D	147.7	65.1
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	60.5
Mortal Kombat X	95.1	65.9
CSR Racing 2	81.1	60.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3670 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 9
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T specs and review.