Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparisons 16-07-2023

Full testing data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Samsung Exynos 2200, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T760 or Exynos 2200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T760

32%

Exynos 2200

67%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T760

83%

Exynos 2200

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T760

31%

Exynos 2200

64%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T760	Exynos 2200
Total score	446896	941706
CPU	125130	263671
GPU	169811	357838
MEM	71503	150662
UX	80437	169511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T760	Exynos 2200
Single-Core	653	1389
Multi-Core	2693	3976

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T760	Exynos 2200
Frequency	2500 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.52 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.82 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4/4x/4y	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2200 is 10% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	2124
# of Cores	5
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.9	35.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.3	111.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.8	66.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.8	61.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	49.8	94.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	75.6	137.1
Real Racing 3	72.3	133.8
Sniper 3D	128.4	147.7
Need for Speed No Limits	81.2	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	84.1	95.1
CSR Racing 2	64.7	81.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	20 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Ivy V510 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	3500 MBit/s.	7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	3670 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2200 is better: 32
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T760 specs and review.

Exynos 2200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2200 specs and review.