 |
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Apple A15 Bionic |
|
Comparisons 14-10-2023 Comprehensive compare data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Apple A15 Bionic, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or A15 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 53% |
A15 Bionic | 60% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 85% |
A15 Bionic | 80% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 52% |
A15 Bionic | 58% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
A15 Bionic | Total score | 738244 | 841983 | CPU | 206711 | 235753 | GPU | 280524 | 319963 | MEM | 118115 | 134709 | UX | 132893 | 151566 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
A15 Bionic | Single-Core | 1058 | 1716 | Multi-Core | 4040 | 4732 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
A15 Bionic | Frequency | 2620 MHz | 3232 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | 15800 millions | Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche 4x1.86 GHz Blizzard | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2800 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 92 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 2 MB | L2 cache | | 4 MB | L3 cache | | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.5 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A15 Bionic is 18% better than HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S has -2 more core than A15 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 3232 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 2989.13 | # of Cores | 4 | 5 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 32.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 87.4 | 99.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.4 | 59.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 49.9 | 55.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 75.8 | 85.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 107.5 | 123.9 | Real Racing 3 | 105.6 | 119.6 | Sniper 3D | 115.4 | 131.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 73.2 | 83.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 77.3 | 86.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.6 | 71.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 12 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | 5G Modem | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 5000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GNSS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic is better: 33 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
A15 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|