Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Allwinner A133 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 benchmark which processor is better

Allwinner A133 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, compare of GPUs Mali-T830 MP2 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy A133 or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

 
Allwinner A133
HiSilicon Kirin 658

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
A1334% Kirin 6584%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
A13367% Kirin 65852%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
A1333% Kirin 6583%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
A133 Kirin 658
Total score6306057552
CPU1764916117
GPU2396221865
MEM100889207
UX1135310368

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
A133 Kirin 658
Single-Core102148
Multi-Core341670

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
A133 Kirin 658
Frequency1600 MHz2100 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A534x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)6 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4LPDDR3x
Max. MemoryDDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz933
Memory bandwidth628
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 23% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Kirin 658. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GE8300Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency660 MHz900 MHz
GFloPS128.7561.2
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.312.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra23.420.1
Call of Duty: Mobile15.512.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)11.59.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition15.512.4
Real Racing 346.825.1
Sniper 3D30.444.2
Need for Speed No Limits37.424.1
Mortal Kombat X33.929.1
CSR Racing 228.128.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


A133 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands