Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Allwinner A133 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 benchmark which processor is better

Allwinner A133 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 506 and PowerVR GE8300.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon SiP1 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy A133 or Snapdragon SiP1 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.


 
Allwinner A133
Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
A1334% Snapdragon SiP14%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
A13367% Snapdragon SiP161%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
A1333% Snapdragon SiP11%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
A133 Snapdragon SiP1
Total score6306066906
CPU1764918732
GPU2396225415
MEM1008810704
UX1135312038

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
A133 Snapdragon SiP1
Single-Core102173
Multi-Core341779

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
A133 Snapdragon SiP1
Frequency1600 MHz1800 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A538x1.48GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)6 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. MemoryDDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz1600
Memory bandwidth610
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon SiP1 is 11% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Snapdragon SiP1. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GE8300Adreno 506
GPU Frequency660 MHz650 MHz
GFloPS128.75130
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units96
Display1920 x 1080 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.313.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra23.423.3
Call of Duty: Mobile15.515.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)11.510.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition15.514.2
Real Racing 346.846.6
Sniper 3D30.430.3
Need for Speed No Limits37.432.6
Mortal Kombat X33.933.8
CSR Racing 228.128
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X9 LTE modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.100 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 is better: 19
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Snapdragon SiP1 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


A133 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


Snapdragon SiP1 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands