|
Allwinner A133 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and PowerVR GE8300. This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy A133 or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA133 | 4% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A133 | 67% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 41% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA133 | 3% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A133 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Total score | 63060 | 50387 | CPU | 17649 | 14101 | GPU | 23962 | 19141 | MEM | 10088 | 8051 | UX | 11353 | 9064 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A133 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Single-Core | 102 | 130 | Multi-Core | 341 | 586 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A133 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1900 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 15% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 5433. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 128.75 | 142 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 15.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.3 | 41.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 23.4 | 27.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.5 | 24.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.5 | 34.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 15.5 | 52.8 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 47.6 | Sniper 3D | 30.4 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 37.4 | 43.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 33.9 | 35.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.1 | 32.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 26 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors A133 and Exynos 7 Octa 5433, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A133 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|