MediaTek MT6750S vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6750S vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, compare of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6750S is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Octane V2, Geekbench, PassMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MT6750S or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6750S

Kirin 658

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6750S

27%

Kirin 658

52%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6750S

Kirin 658

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6750S	Kirin 658
Total score	43417	57552
CPU	12166	16117
GPU	16494	21865
MEM	6942	9207
UX	7813	10368

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6750S	Kirin 658
Single-Core	115	148
Multi-Core	530	670

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6750S	Kirin 658
Frequency	1500 MHz	2100 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	933
Memory bandwidth	6	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 28% better than MT6750S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T860 MP2	Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	44.13	61.2
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	13.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	35.3	12.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	20.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	12.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	29.9	9.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	44.9	12.4
Real Racing 3	41	25.1
Sniper 3D	30.4	44.2
Need for Speed No Limits	42.1	24.1
Mortal Kombat X	26.9	29.1
CSR Racing 2	32.8	28.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6750S is better: 11
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6750S and Kirin 658, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6750S SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6750S specs and review.

Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 658 specs and review.