|
Allwinner A133 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, compare of GPUs Adreno 508 and PowerVR GE8300. This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 630 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy A133 or Snapdragon 630 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A133 | 67% |
Snapdragon 630 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A133 |
Snapdragon 630 | Total score | 63060 | 66704 | CPU | 17649 | 18684 | GPU | 23962 | 25348 | MEM | 10088 | 10665 | UX | 11353 | 12001 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A133 |
Snapdragon 630 | Single-Core | 102 | 172 | Multi-Core | 341 | 776 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A133 |
Snapdragon 630 | Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 10.66 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 630 is 27% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Snapdragon 630. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 508 | GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 128.75 | 170 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.3 | 13.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 23.4 | 23.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.5 | 15.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.5 | 10.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 15.5 | 14.2 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 40.6 | Sniper 3D | 30.4 | 30.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 37.4 | 32.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 33.9 | 33.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.1 | 32.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 is better: 21 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs A133 and Snapdragon 630, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A133 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Snapdragon 630 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MT6750T • Vs MT6750 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|