|
HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, comparison of GPUs Adreno 418 and Mali-T830 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, Geekbench, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 658 or Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 658 | 4% |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 658 | 52% |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | 38% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 658 | 3% |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | Total score | 57552 | 63981 | CPU | 16117 | 17918 | GPU | 21865 | 24320 | MEM | 9207 | 10236 | UX | 10368 | 11509 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | Single-Core | 148 | 165 | Multi-Core | 670 | 745 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 658 |
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 | Frequency | 2100 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 4% better than Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 658 has -2 more core than Snapdragon 808 MSM8992. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T830 MP2 | Adreno 418 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 61.2 | 172.8 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 12.2 | 12.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 20.1 | 22.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 12.1 | 14.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 9.7 | 10.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 12.4 | 13.7 | Real Racing 3 | 25.1 | 28.4 | Sniper 3D | 44.2 | 36.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 24.1 | 31.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.1 | 36.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.1 | 31.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 21 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X10 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 450 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 is better: 22 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 658 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|