Comparisons 22-05-2022
Detailed testing data of Rockchip RK3566 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Rockchip RK3566 or Kirin 658.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Rockchip RK3566 | 5% |
Kirin 658 | 14% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Rockchip RK3566 | 18% |
Kirin 658 | 43% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Kirin 658 | 12% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3566 |
Kirin 658 | | Total score | 64108 | 57552 | | CPU | 5870 | 18554 | | GPU | 6458 | 19154 | | MEM | 3517 | 10694 | | UX | 2943 | 8918 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3566 |
Kirin 658 | | Single-Core | 168 | 148 | | Multi-Core | 503 | 670 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3566 |
Kirin 658 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 16 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 667 | 933 | | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 28 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 658 is 4% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3566 has 4 more core than Kirin 658. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-T830 MP2 | | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 900 MHz | | GFloPS | 404 | 61.2 | | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 12.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 20.1 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 12.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 9.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 12.4 | | Real Racing 3 | | 25.1 | | Sniper 3D | | 44.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 24.1 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 29.1 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 28.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• MediaTek MT8168 Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700
|
