MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) vs HiSilicon Kirin 658, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 658 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, 3DMark, and how good the chips are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) or Kirin 658 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

Kirin 658

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

26%

Kirin 658

52%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)

Kirin 658

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)	Kirin 658
Total score	54931	57552
CPU	15371	16117
GPU	20866	21865
MEM	8786	9207
UX	9887	10368

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)	Kirin 658
Single-Core	142	148
Multi-Core	639	670

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)	Kirin 658
Frequency	2200 MHz	2100 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	933
Memory bandwidth	13	28
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is 4% better than Kirin 658 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T860 MP2	Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	54.31	61.2
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	18.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	46.5	12.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	32.2	20.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.9	12.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	38.2	9.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	58.7	12.4
Real Racing 3	56.4	25.1
Sniper 3D	41.9	44.2
Need for Speed No Limits	38.6	24.1
Mortal Kombat X	37	29.1
CSR Racing 2	35.4	28.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) is better: 15
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 658 is better: 18
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) and Kirin 658, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) specs and review.

Kirin 658 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 658 specs and review.