Allwinner A133 vs Intel Atom Z3590

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Intel Atom Z3590, comparison of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and PowerVR GE8300.

This performance comparison includes two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, 3DMark, Octane V2, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy A133 or Atom Z3590 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A133

Atom Z3590

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A133

67%

Atom Z3590

35%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A133

Atom Z3590

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A133	Atom Z3590
Total score	63060	49101
CPU	17649	13755
GPU	23962	18661
MEM	10088	7866
UX	11353	8833

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A133	Atom Z3590
Single-Core	102	130
Multi-Core	341	600

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A133	Atom Z3590
Frequency	1600 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.5 GHz Moorefield
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz	1600
Memory bandwidth	6	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 36% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	PowerVR G6430
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	640 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	163.78
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		16.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	14.3	41.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	27.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	24.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	11.5	34.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.5	51.5
Real Racing 3	46.8	48.1
Sniper 3D	30.4	60.5
Need for Speed No Limits	37.4	49.5
Mortal Kombat X	33.9	39.9
CSR Racing 2	28.1	35.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Intel XMM 7160
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	72 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 19
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs A133 and Atom Z3590, as well as read the test results at the links below.

A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• A133 specs and review.

Atom Z3590 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Atom Z3590 specs and review.