Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD), compare of GPUs Mali-T880 MP2 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Helio P25 (MT6757CD) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the CPUs are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy A133 or Helio P25 (MT6757CD) and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A133

Helio P25 (MT6757CD)

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A133

67%

Helio P25 (MT6757CD)

49%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A133

Helio P25 (MT6757CD)

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A133	Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
Total score	63060	64246
CPU	17649	17996
GPU	23962	24413
MEM	10088	10287
UX	11353	11557

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A133	Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
Single-Core	102	166
Multi-Core	341	748

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A133	Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
Frequency	1600 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb	LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz
Memory bandwidth	6	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 (MT6757CD) is 38% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Helio P25 (MT6757CD). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-T880 MP2
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	1000 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	68
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	14.3	13.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.4	23.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	15.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	11.5	11.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.5	14.4
Real Racing 3	46.8	29.3
Sniper 3D	30.4	30.4
Need for Speed No Limits	37.4	37.4
Mortal Kombat X	33.9	30.4
CSR Racing 2	28.1	32.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) is better: 20
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets A133 and Helio P25 (MT6757CD), and also read the test results on the links under the article.

A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• A133 specs and review.

Helio P25 (MT6757CD) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Helio P25 (MT6757CD) specs and review.