Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Allwinner A133 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 benchmark which processor is better

Allwinner A133 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).

   This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Atom x5-Z8300 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3 etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy A133 or Atom x5-Z8300 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.


 
Allwinner A133
Intel Atom x5-Z8300

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
A1334% Atom x5-Z83004%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
A13367% Atom x5-Z830054%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
A1333% Atom x5-Z83001%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
A133 Atom x5-Z8300
Total score6306062268
CPU1764917437
GPU2396223658
MEM100889967
UX1135311201

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
A133 Atom x5-Z8300
Single-Core102161
Multi-Core341725

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
A133 Atom x5-Z8300
Frequency1600 MHz1440 MHz
Cores44
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A534x1.44-1.84 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)6 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4LPDDR3
Max. MemoryDDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb2 Gb
Memory Frequency2x LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz1600
Memory bandwidth66
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A133 is 9% better than Atom x5-Z8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GE8300Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
GPU Frequency660 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS128.7596
# of Cores216
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.313.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra23.422.9
Call of Duty: Mobile15.514.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)11.510.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition15.514.9
Real Racing 346.840.1
Sniper 3D30.436.6
Need for Speed No Limits37.441.2
Mortal Kombat X33.936.6
CSR Racing 228.129.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemA-GOLD 620
Download speed150 MBit/s.21 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.6 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is better: 7
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs A133 and Atom x5-Z8300, as well as read the test results at the links below.
A133 SoC - all data

• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Devices lists
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Atom x5-Z8300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


A133 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


Atom x5-Z8300 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands